looks good. It's better than the previous wording. cheers, Rémi
----- Mail original ----- > De: "Stuart Marks" <stuart.ma...@oracle.com> > À: "core-libs-dev" <core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Envoyé: Vendredi 18 Août 2017 21:59:25 > Objet: RFR(s) #2: 6344935: (spec) clarify specifications for Object.wait > overloads > Hi all, > > Well nothing is ever simple, is it? Prompted by David Holmes' comments, I > looked > at the other overloads of wait(), and I agree that they're in need of > cleanup. I > decided to put the most complete version of the specification into the > wait(timeout, nanos) overload, and then I simply redefined the other overloads > wait(timeout) and wait() in terms of the first. This avoids redundancies that > creep in when what ought to be the same specification is replicated across > different overloads (which is probably how the specs for these methods > diverged > in the first place). > > I've incorporated comments from Martin Buchholz and Hans Boehm. I've done a > little bit of rewriting where I thought it was necessary, particularly in the > lead sentences of the specs. Plus I added a few editorial cleanups. > > Since this has gotten bigger, here's a webrev: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/6344935/webrev.1/ > > Please review. Thanks. > > s'marks
