+1 (there should) On Dec 8, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: > > Should there be changes to general purpose collection testing classes like > test/jdk/java/util/concurrent/tck/CollectionTest.java > test/jdk/java/util/Collection/MOAT.java > that would have caught this bug? > (although those are mostly designed for mutable collections, but I think > some immutable collections (nCopies?) get tested somewhere.
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce number of implementation cl... Remi Forax
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce number of implementati... Claes Redestad
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce number of implemen... Paul Sandoz
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce number of impl... John Rose
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce number of ... Remi Forax
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce numbe... John Rose
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce number of implemen... Claes Redestad
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce number of impl... Andrej Golovnin
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce number of ... Claes Redestad
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce numbe... Martin Buchholz
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce n... John Rose
- Re: [10?] RFR: 8193128: Reduce n... Stuart Marks
- Re: [11] RFR: 8193128: Reduce nu... Claes Redestad
- Re: [11] RFR: 8193128: Reduce nu... Andrej Golovnin
- Re: [11] RFR: 8193128: Reduce nu... Claes Redestad
- Re: [11] RFR: 8193128: Reduce nu... Peter Levart
- Re: [11] RFR: 8193128: Reduce nu... Peter Levart
- Re: [11] RFR: 8193128: Reduce nu... Claes Redestad
- Re: [11] RFR: 8193128: Reduce nu... Peter Levart
- Re: [11] RFR: 8193128: Reduce nu... Peter Levart
- Re: [11] RFR: 8193128: Reduce nu... Claes Redestad