Hi All,

Apologies for dredging up an older mail thread. I lurk and follow along with 
various JDK development threads and this 166 integration change jumped out at 
me. I have to confess although I understood the intent of the change and the 
explanation in the comments, like David I found it very difficult to navigate 
the actual changeset itself. I was hoping that there would be continued 
discussion that I could follow along with and that this would help me too.  I 
was surprised therefore when I didn’t see any further discussion, and then 
noticed that the change had actually been committed 
(http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/d04f72c354e9 
<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/d04f72c354e9>). Was there some further 
discussion on another list/thread that I missed that someone could direct me to?

Thanks,

Chris

> On Feb 10, 2019, at 10:41 PM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 8215363: needless signals in ForkJoinPool
>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/jsr166-integration/forkjoin-signals/index.html
>>  
>> <https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/jsr166-integration/forkjoin-signals/index.html>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215363 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215363>
> 
> Can't comment - the code is unfathomable.

Reply via email to