> On May 31, 2019, at 8:02 AM, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> wrote: > > +1
Thanks. > > On 5/31/19 2:19 AM, David Holmes wrote: >> Hi Kim, >> >> This seems reasonable to me. >> >> Thanks, >> David >> >> On 31/05/2019 7:04 am, Kim Barrett wrote: >>>> On May 30, 2019, at 3:58 PM, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Kim, >>>> >>>> To ensure you see some messages in the case of timeouts, it would be >>>> useful to call System.out.flush() after printing the message in >>>> logProcess(). >>> >>> Good idea; added. >>> >>> full: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8219149/open.01/ >>> incr: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8219149/open.01.inc/ >>> >>>> I'm ok with the timestamps, as is, though the Duration might be useful in >>>> some cases. >>> >>> As I discussed with Roger, I want to keep the change simple for now, >>> as we're not yet sure where to expend effort looking deeper. I think >>> comparing timestamps in just a few cases will tell us a lot (possibly >>> that we're looking in entirely the wrong place, in which case we might >>> just undo this change).
