> On May 31, 2019, at 2:19 AM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi Kim, > > This seems reasonable to me. > > Thanks, > David
Thanks. > > On 31/05/2019 7:04 am, Kim Barrett wrote: >>> On May 30, 2019, at 3:58 PM, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Kim, >>> >>> To ensure you see some messages in the case of timeouts, it would be >>> useful to call System.out.flush() after printing the message in >>> logProcess(). >> Good idea; added. >> full: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8219149/open.01/ >> incr: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8219149/open.01.inc/ >>> I'm ok with the timestamps, as is, though the Duration might be useful in >>> some cases. >> As I discussed with Roger, I want to keep the change simple for now, >> as we're not yet sure where to expend effort looking deeper. I think >> comparing timestamps in just a few cases will tell us a lot (possibly >> that we're looking in entirely the wrong place, in which case we might >> just undo this change).
