On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 18:50:19 GMT, Ivan Šipka <isi...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> @iignatev  could you please review? Thank you.
> 
> note to self:
> jtreg test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/InheritIO/InheritIoTest.java 
> test/jdk/java/lang/SecurityManager/modules/CustomSecurityManagerTest.java 
> test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/uncaughtexceptions/UncaughtExceptionsTest.java 
> test/jdk/java/lang/annotation/loaderLeak/LoaderLeakTest.java

test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/InheritIO/InheritIo.java line 26:

> 24: import static java.lang.ProcessBuilder.Redirect.*;
> 25: 
> 26: class InheritIo {

The rename of the class is unnecessary and less readable. 
The function being tested is inheritIO and the test name should match. (As does 
the directory it is in).

test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/InheritIO/InheritIoTest.java line 42:

> 40: 
> 41: public class InheritIoTest {
> 42: 

Having two classes and files with similar names is confusing.  TestInhieritIO 
and InheritIOTest.

Since InheritIO already has subclasses that are the ones being invoked; 
that leaves methods in InheritIO to have the test cases.

test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/uncaughtexceptions/UncaughtExceptionsTest.java line 
40:

> 38:  */
> 39: public class UncaughtExceptionsTest {
> 40: 

As with InheritIO, the nested classes that are invoked can be included in a 
single .java file.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1484

Reply via email to