On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:34:30 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Attila Szegedi has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
>> commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences
>> compared to the previous content of the PR.
>
> test/jdk/jdk/dynalink/TypeConverterFactoryMemoryLeakTest.java line 79:
>
>> 77:
>> 78: public static void main(String[] args) {
>> 79: for (int count = 0; count < MAX_ITERATIONS; ++count) {
>
> Here and later: use postfix `count++`, regular style?
Old habits die hard; I think I started doing this about 30 years ago when
writing C code against a compiler on Atari ST that emitted more efficient
MC68000 code for `++i` than for `i++`. I guess it's time to unlearn this :-) Of
course, if you wanted to get the fastest code, you would've counted
_decrementing to zero_ to let the compiler use the DBRA (decrement and branch)
instruction.
It's funny how I _don't_ miss those days.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2617
