On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:10:15 GMT, Attila Szegedi <att...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> test/jdk/jdk/dynalink/TypeConverterFactoryMemoryLeakTest.java line 79:
>>
>>> 77:
>>> 78: public static void main(String[] args) {
>>> 79: for (int count = 0; count < MAX_ITERATIONS; ++count) {
>>
>> Here and later: use postfix `count++`, regular style?
>
> Old habits die hard; I think I started doing this about 30 years ago when
> writing C code against a compiler on Atari ST that emitted more efficient
> MC68000 code for `++i` than for `i++`. I guess it's time to unlearn this :-)
> Of course, if you wanted to get the fastest code, you would've counted
> _decrementing to zero_ to let the compiler use the DBRA (decrement and
> branch) instruction.
>
> It's funny how I _don't_ miss those days.
Good!
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2617
