On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 17:34:17 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Not sure. >> If the convention is to document every single `RuntimeException` that >> methods invoked by this one could throw, then yes. >> In other words, should `RuntimeExcpetion`s thrown deep in an invocation >> stack be documented in every caller method? > > In principle, yes. In practice, I see that `namedGroups` doesn't have an > `@throws UnsupportedOperationException` but has an `@implSpec` that says that > the default implementation throws `UnsupportedOperationException`. This seems > strange to me - maybe @stuart-marks or @jddarcy can comment. > > What I was hinting at here however is that we might want to extend the > `@implSpec` of the new methods to note that these method will throw > `UnsuportedOperationException` if `namedGroups` is not implemented (like the > `@implSpec` of `namedGroups` does). Ah, I see. So what you mean is not adding another @throws clause but to either improve @implNote or, better, to add @implSpec. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10000
