On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 18:42:53 GMT, Naoto Sato <na...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Console.java line 108:
>>
>>> 106: public PrintWriter writer() {
>>> 107: throw new UnsupportedOperationException(
>>> 108: "Console class itself does not provide
>>> implementation");
>>
>> Hello Naoto, should we perhaps then mark this method (and thus the class
>> too) as `abstract` and leave the sub-classes to provide this method's
>> implementation? Same with the other methods where we now throw
>> `UnsupportedOperationException`.
>
> Thanks for the review, Jai. You're right that making it `abstract` would
> eliminate implementations in `Console` class, but I was hesitant to do so, as
> it is a spec change that would suggest readers to think that `Console` is
> generally pluggable (which is not).
That's reasonable and I think the current non-abstract form is fine then.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11615
