> This PR suggests we can speed up `StringLatin1.regionMatchesCI` by applying 
> 'the oldest ASCII trick in the book'.
> 
> The new static method `CharacterDataLatin1.equalsIgnoreCase` compares two 
> latin1 bytes for equality ignoring case. `StringLatin1.regionMatchesCI` is 
> updated to use `equalsIgnoreCase`
> 
> To verify the correctness of `equalsIgnoreCase`, a new test is added  to 
> `EqualsIgnoreCase` with an exhaustive verification that all 256x256 latin1 
> code point pairs have an `equalsIgnoreCase` consistent with 
> Character.toUpperCase, Character.toLowerCase.
> 
> Performance is tested for matching and mismatching cases of code point pairs 
> picked from the ASCII letter, ASCII number and latin1 letter ranges. Results 
> in the first comment below.

Eirik Bjorsnos has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  Add clarifying comments and use more descriptive variable names in the latin1 
verification EqualsIgnoreCase test

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12632/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12632/files/59c42298..84517102

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=12632&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=12632&range=01-02

  Stats: 16 lines in 1 file changed: 5 ins; 2 del; 9 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12632.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12632/head:pull/12632

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12632

Reply via email to