On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 12:15:39 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It seems reasonable to keep these two in sync, yes. (`CharacterData.of`
>> could even call into `StringLatin1.canEncode`, unless that's cause for some
>> performance anomaly)
>
>> `if (ch && 0xFFFFFF00 == 0) {`
>
> This seems to perform similar to baseline:
>
>
> Benchmark (codePoint) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
> Characters.isDigit 48 avgt 15 0.890 ± 0.025 ns/op
> Characters.isDigit 1632 avgt 15 2.174 ± 0.011 ns/op
>
>
> Would be interesting to check the performance on non-Intel architectures. If
> you want to give it a spin on your M1, here's the benchmark command I used:
>
> `make test TEST='micro:java.lang.Characters.isDigit' MICRO="OPTIONS=-p
> codePoint=48,1632"`
> It seems reasonable to keep these two in sync, yes. (`CharacterData.of` could
> even call into `StringLatin1.canEncode`, unless that's cause for some
> performance anomaly)
If I update `StringLatin1.canEncode` and call into that from
`CharacterData.of`, I observe no regression for the Latin1 case, but a
significant regression for the non-Latin1 case. I have no idea how to explain
that:
Benchmark (codePoint) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
Characters.isDigit 48 avgt 15 0.675 ± 0.029 ns/op
Characters.isDigit 1632 avgt 15 2.435 ± 0.032 ns/op
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13040
