On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:23:19 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> High level comment: these days we usually try to use junit 5 / jupiter > instead of TestNG. I think my choice of testNG here might have been influenced by other ZIP area tests using testNG. I guess a rewrite to junit should be pretty straightforward. @LanceAndersen Do you have any opinion on junit/testNG for tests like this? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12563#issuecomment-1488617459
