On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 19:54:48 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev <tval...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> In the same spirit, `reversed()` should also have a default implementation >> equivalent to >> >> >> Collections.unmodifiableSequenceCollection(Arrays.asList(this.toArray())).reversed() > > @forax but this would not be a view: changes in the underlying collection > won't be reflected Yes, The spec says :"Changes to the underlying collection might or might not be visible in this reversed view, depending upon the implementation." so i believe the default implementation i proposed is a valid implementation ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/7387#discussion_r1152426988
