On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:45:08 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent 
>> `@see` tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>> 
>> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073.   That PR was withdrawn, and 
>> based on the ensuing discussion and suggestion, is now being handled with a 
>> series of PRs for various separate parts of the system.  Follow-up PRs will 
>> be provided for the rest of `java.base`, for `java.desktop`, and for XML 
>> APIs.  The "LangTools" modules have already been updated.  The "External 
>> Specifications" page has been temporarily [disabled][] until this work is 
>> complete.
>> 
>> While the primary content of the change was automated, I've manually 
>> adjusted the formatting, to break long lines.
>> 
>> It is clear there is significant inconsistency in the ordering of block tags 
>> in doc comment.   We might want to (separately) consider normalizing the 
>> order of the tags, perhaps according to the order defined for the tags in 
>> the generated output, as given [here][]
>> 
>> [here]: 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/83cf28f99639d80e62c4031c4c9752460de5f36c/make/Docs.gmk#L68
>> [disabled]: 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/83cf28f99639d80e62c4031c4c9752460de5f36c/make/Docs.gmk#L115
>
> Jonathan Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   address review feedback

I had a look at the java.net part and it looks reasonable.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by dfuchs (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13248#pullrequestreview-1366700592

Reply via email to