On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 19:02:22 GMT, Jim Laskey <jlas...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Enhance the Java programming language with string templates, which are 
>> similar to string literals but contain embedded expressions. A string 
>> template is interpreted at run time by replacing each expression with the 
>> result of evaluating that expression, possibly after further validation and 
>> transformation. This is a [preview language feature and 
>> API](http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/12).
>
> Jim Laskey has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
> or a rebase. The pull request now contains 75 commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into 8285932
>  - Change MAX_INDY_CONCAT_ARG_SLOTS to be updatable.
>  - Clean up Error handling
>  - Recommended changes
>  - RuntimeException is the only exception type that can is deduced from a 
> lambda.
>  - Update combine example
>  - Merge branch 'master' into 8285932
>  - Update StringTemplate.combine javadoc
>  - Requested review changes.
>  - Clean up list construction
>  - ... and 65 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/bc151633...f1b187a1

The PreviewFeature annotations can/should be removed from classes/methods that 
are not part of the public interface. They are unnecessary and possibly 
misleading, implying part of the public interface.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/runtime/Carriers.java line 554:

> 552: 
> 553:     /**
> 554:      * Class used to tally ahd track the number of ints, longs and 
> objects.

typo: ahd

src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/util/FormatConcatItem.java line 37:

> 35:  * @since 21
> 36:  */
> 37: @PreviewFeature(feature=PreviewFeature.Feature.STRING_TEMPLATES)

Generally, The `PreviewFeature` annotation is not needed on internal APIs and 
serves little purpose.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10889#pullrequestreview-1383555414
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10889#discussion_r1165702256
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10889#discussion_r1165631226

Reply via email to