On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:41:58 GMT, Volker Simonis <simo...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This issue was reported by: Yakov Shafranovich >> ([yako...@amazon.com](mailto:yako...@amazon.com)) >> >> Currently, `ObjectInputStream::readObject()` doesn't explicitly checks for a >> negative array length in the deserialization stream. Instead it calls >> `j.l.r.Array::newInstance(..)` with the negative length which results in a >> `NegativeArraySizeException`. NegativeArraySizeException is an unchecked >> exception which is neither declared in the signature of >> `ObjectInputStream::readObject()` nor mentioned in its API specification. It >> is therefore not obvious for users of `ObjectInputStream::readObject()` that >> they may have to handle `NegativeArraySizeException`s. It would therefor be >> better if a negative array length in the deserialization stream would be >> automatically wrapped in an `InvalidClassException` which is a checked >> exception (derived from `IOException` via `ObjectStreamException`) and >> declared in the signature of `ObjectInputStream::readObject()`. >> >> If we do the negative array length check in >> `ObjectInputStream::readObject()` before filtering, this will then also fix >> `ObjectInputFilter.FilterInfo::arrayLength()` which is defined as: >> >> Returns: >> the non-negative number of array elements when deserializing an array of the >> class, otherwise -1 >> >> but currently returns a negative value if the array length is negative. > > Volker Simonis has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Addresed review comments of @turbanoff, @shipilev and @RogerRiggs Also, merge from master to get Windows GHA fixed. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13540#issuecomment-1520454810
