On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 06:18:10 GMT, Per Minborg <pminb...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Have we considered moving the Impl classes into a non-public area such as > `jdk.internal` to improve encapsulation and reduce perceived footprint? I don't see much of a problem to keep the non-public classes in `java.lang.constant` since it's not open and no reflective access. Not sure what perceived footprint you referred to as the JDK footprint won't change. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13615#issuecomment-1523695438
