On Fri, 19 May 2023 22:57:39 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadam...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > This look much better. Can we strengthen the specification of > > `canonicalLayouts` in accordance with the class specification > > We can't do more in that method javadoc, think, as that has to be general > enough for all linkers. I think the rules set up in that method javadoc are > good - e.g. the set of layouts should be stable (both in terms of names and > layout types). > > What we can do is to sprinkle some wording in the `nativeLinker` factory - > e.g. `the native linker is guaranteed to provide canonical layouts for basic > C types <link to the class section>`. Yes, that's better. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14037#issuecomment-1555361325
