On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:09:12 GMT, Julian Waters <jwat...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> On Windows, the basic Java Integer types are defined as long and __int64 >> respectively. In particular, the former is rather problematic since it >> breaks compilation as the Visual C++ becomes stricter and more compliant >> with every release, which means the way Windows code treats long as a >> typedef for int is no longer correct, especially with -permissive- enabled. >> Instead of changing every piece of broken code to match the jint = long >> typedef, which is far too time consuming, we can instead change jint to an >> int (which is still the same 32 bit number type as long), as there are far >> fewer problems caused by this definition. It's better to get this over and >> done with sooner than later when a future version of Visual C++ finally >> starts to break on existing code > > Julian Waters has updated the pull request incrementally with three > additional commits since the last revision: > > - Swap to jint in awt_MenuBar.h > - Swap to jint in awt_MenuBar.cpp > - Swap to jint in awt_Menu.h Alright, done ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14125#issuecomment-1605222563
