On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:33:56 GMT, Paul Sandoz <psan...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I think its definitely a better fit, but another aspect of my previous > comment was wondering if we need a radix sort if the vectorized quicksort > implementation is fast enough. IMO we need to compare performance results > with the vectorized quick sort, and be aware of future enhancements to that. In this comment https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14227#issuecomment-1728440839 I asked Vamsi to compare current version in JDK (base), base + AVX512, Radix sort for all cases + AVX512, Radix sort for parallel case + AVX512. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13568#issuecomment-1728444843
