On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 17:35:31 GMT, Per Minborg <pminb...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR proposes to reformat all the JavaDocs for the FFM API. This would 
>> bring the FFM API docs more in line with the existing Java documentation 
>> (see below).  Occasional drive-by fixes are also included in this PR (such 
>> as spelling and capitalization).
>> 
>> I am aware this PR will (if approved) make a significant mark in the change 
>> logs which is regrettable.
>> 
>> Background:
>> 
>> Older classes like `Object` and `List` have a maximum line length of 80 
>> characters whereas newer classes like `ScopedValue` have a maximum line 
>> length of 90 characters.
>> 
>> The FFM API currently has javadoc lines that exceed 135 characters per line. 
>> It is also customary to use double spaces when starting a new sentence.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Remove additional redundant full stops

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/MemoryLayout.java line 510:

> 508:      *          the given alignment constraint (in bytes)}
> 509:      *
> 510:      * @param byteAlignment the layout alignment constraint, expressed 
> in bytes.

period?

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/MemoryLayout.java line 848:

> 846: 
> 847:         /**
> 848:          * Returns a path element which selects a member layout with the 
> given name in a

It feels like the javadoc of the methods in here can be tightened using 
`{@return}`. Maybe for another PR.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/MemoryLayout.java line 1017:

> 1015:      * @param elementCount the sequence element count
> 1016:      * @param elementLayout the sequence element layout
> 1017:      * @return the new sequence layout with the given element layout 
> and size.

period?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16518#discussion_r1383726736
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16518#discussion_r1383728935
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16518#discussion_r1383729384

Reply via email to