On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 16:26:02 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Xiaohong Gong has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains ten additional 
>> commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Separate neon and sve functions into two source files
>>  - Merge branch 'jdk:master' into JDK-8312425
>>  - Rename vmath to sleef in configure
>>  - Address review comments in build system
>>  - Add a bundled native lib in jdk as a bridge to libsleef
>>  - Merge 'jdk:master' into JDK-8312425
>>  - Disable sleef by default
>>  - Merge 'jdk:master' into JDK-8312425
>>  - 8312425: [vectorapi] AArch64: Optimize vector math operations with SLEEF
>
> doc/building.md line 639:
> 
>> 637: 
>> 638: libsleef, the [SIMD Library for Evaluating Elementary Functions](
>> 639: https://sleef.org/) is required when building libvmath.so on 
>> Linux/aarch64
> 
> This is incorrect. The library is not required, but if it is present, we will 
> build libvmath with it.
> 
> Edit: Or rather, this is misleading. Technically it is correct, since you 
> state that it is required when building libvmath.so, but it is easy to 
> mistake for being required for building the JDK. The reader presumably does 
> not know what libvmath.so is or how it is used.
> 
> Please rephrase this to so that it is clear that this is optional, but will 
> provide performance benefits to the resulting JDK if present. You do not need 
> to mention libvmath.so here, for no other dependency do we declare what parts 
> of the JDK that require it -- it is not essential for this document.
> 
> Also see if you can make this paragraph and the one at the end be a bit more 
> tighter, not the last paragraph seems to be both repeat and contradict this 
> one.

Hi @magicus , the doc is updated. Thanks for your comment on this!

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16234#discussion_r1416964362

Reply via email to