On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 17:44:24 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs <eir...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review this PR which rewrites the BadFactoryTest to pure Java/JUnit. 
> The test is currently implemented using a mix of shell script and a Java main 
> method. 
> 
> Reviewers may notice the following changes:
> 
> - The shell script file `BadFactoryTest.sh` has been retired and jtreg tags 
> moved over to `BadFactoryTest.java`
> - The main method has been replaced with a JUnit `@Test` method
> - The service definition file used to be packaged into a jar file, now the 
> source directory is instead directly added to the classpath using `@library 
> /javax/script/JDK_8196959`
> - The `@summary` tag was updated since the existing summary was slightly 
> confusing
> - To make jtreg happy, the SecurityManager-enabled invocation now runs with 
> `-Djava.security.manager=allow` instead of just `-Djava.security.manager`
> - A sanity check was added to verify that `ScriptEngineManager` can actually 
> find and load `BadFactory`. Such a check would have detected the issue which 
> inspired this rewrite, see  #16585.
> 
> Verified by running:
> 
> 
> % make test TEST="test/jdk/javax/script/JDK_8196959"
>   [..]
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR  
>  
>    jtreg:test/jdk/javax/script/JDK_8196959               1     1     0     0  
>  
> 
> 
> Note that the original issue JDK-8196959 is not available in JBS, so my 
> understanding of what the original test does is based on code inspection.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16830

Reply via email to