On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:47:11 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> lingjun-cg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format > > For StringBuf proxy, is it acceptible for us to introduce a new jdk.internal > public interface (accessible only within java.base module) to expose common > public methods in AbstractStringBuilder? We have public types extending or > implementing non-public-types in the JDK (AbstractStringBuilder, > NamedPackage) so I guess having a new module-specific superinterface would be > fine? Need verification from API experts. Hi @liach Do you know any other places within java.base where we would need the same proxy for StringBuffer? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19513#issuecomment-2174283589
