On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:10:29 GMT, Emanuel Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ideal output for `VectorReinterpret` seems to follow a similar pattern to >> `LoadVector`...etc with regards to the vector size. So seems like a similar >> solution could be implemented: >> >> >> 1306 VectorReinterpret === _ 1307 [[ 1286 ]] #vectory<I,8> >> !orig=1179,979,[846],[738],[646],[145] !jvms: >> TestCompatibleUseDefTypeSize::test7 @ bci:13 (line 427) > > Very nice. That would be a good follow-up RFE. Do you want to work on that > one? Otherwise you could tag it as a `starter` task, and we'll eventually > find someone to do it ;) Yeah I'd like to work on it. Seems like a good one to work in between bigger tasks. I had a question about it though. I noticed that `STORE_VECTOR` is also in a similar situation. Any specific reason to leave that one as is? Or was it just an oversight? If an oversight, a second RFE could be added for that one? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26457#discussion_r2313379507
