On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:16:39 GMT, Galder ZamarreƱo <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Very nice. That would be a good follow-up RFE. Do you want to work on that >> one? Otherwise you could tag it as a `starter` task, and we'll eventually >> find someone to do it ;) > > Yeah I'd like to work on it. Seems like a good one to work in between bigger > tasks. > > I had a question about it though. I noticed that `STORE_VECTOR` is also in a > similar situation. Any specific reason to leave that one as is? Or was it > just an oversight? If an oversight, a second RFE could be added for that one? It would probably also be good if we did stores as well, yes. But you'll touch many many tests, having to specify the type of the store. Still I would say it is worth it š ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26457#discussion_r2313398780
