On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:19:31 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Is this a straight backout of >>> [4ced4e7](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4ced4e73fc0a517df826860839681004bb67e624)? >>> Shouldn't this be `[BACKOUT] ...` issue then? >> >> Yes, it is a straight backout; I can add the [backout] prefix to the >> regression title. > >> > Is this a straight backout of >> > [4ced4e7](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4ced4e73fc0a517df826860839681004bb67e624)? >> > Shouldn't this be `[BACKOUT] ...` issue then? >> >> Yes, it is a straight backout; I can add the [backout] prefix to the >> regression title. > > Cool. Sorry for being overly retentive here, but as per > [Guide](https://openjdk.org/guide/#backing-out-a-change), you need to name > it: `[BACKOUT] Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte'` ;) > @shipilev I can create a new issue with exactly the prescribed text. But > changing the purpose of the issue that was filed to be a simple back-out > seems like its loosing information. No need to create new issues. Guide mentions "Alternative 2": you just convert this "investigation" issue into "backout" issue, and move it to be a subtask of the original issue. There is no loss of information, just a few metadata changes? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27346#issuecomment-3303828868
