On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:52:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Is this a straight backout of >>> > [4ced4e7](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4ced4e73fc0a517df826860839681004bb67e624)? >>> > Shouldn't this be `[BACKOUT] ...` issue then? >>> >>> Yes, it is a straight backout; I can add the [backout] prefix to the >>> regression title. >> >> Cool. Sorry for being overly retentive here, but as per >> [Guide](https://openjdk.org/guide/#backing-out-a-change), you need to name >> it: `[BACKOUT] Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte'` ;) > >> @shipilev I can create a new issue with exactly the prescribed text. But >> changing the purpose of the issue that was filed to be a simple back-out >> seems like its loosing information. > > No need to create new issues. Guide mentions "Alternative 2": you just > convert this "investigation" issue into "backout" issue, and move it to be a > subtask of the original issue. There is no loss of information, just a few > metadata changes? @shipilev FYI this issue already has a release note subtask, so the issue itself cannot be converted to a subtask. We might need to move the release note too. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27346#issuecomment-3303840514
