On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 19:54:28 GMT, Joe Darcy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Patrick Strawderman has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Add coverage for other factory methods: noneOf, of, etc > > Hmm. Catching up on reviews, should the behavior change here get a CSR? More > broader, should there be an implSpec change under a follow-up bug and CSR > that requires this behavior? @jddarcy Seems reasonable! Chasing down the super-implementation, [Set::spliterator()](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/25/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Set.html#spliterator()) states that overloads should report their characteristics (even if the documentation linked does seem to unnecessarily convolutedly state which characteristics the default implementation provides). I can open up a new Issue and handle the CSR-bits if @kilink doesn't mind? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28568#issuecomment-3621388432
