On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 10:02:53 GMT, Andrew Haley <[email protected]> wrote:

> > The IR test framework is better at determining that by testing the right IR 
> > nodes are generated - and they get run as part of the existing HotSpot test 
> > suite.
> 
> But as a reviewer I'm not looking at the IR at all, but at the performance.

That's a good point. Where i have concerns is introducing a very large set of 
vector micro benchmarks in bulk or over time in to the mainline under the 
`test/micro` directory. Further, i am not very happy with the way we generate 
the vector API benchmarks by leaning on the unit test harness (of which i am 
also not so happy about). A better approach might be to generate a benchmark on 
demand for an operation so it can be verified if needed. I think to do this 
properly we need to invest some resources, which are limited, at least from my 
side, and so would require some adjustment in priorities.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28693#issuecomment-3812696618

Reply via email to