On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 13:31:06 GMT, Emanuel Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @jatin-bhateja Do you even need `is_unsupported_lane_type`, if >> `match_rule_supported_vector` should already cover all concrete operations? > > And: please don't "resolve" a conversation when I might still want to come > back to your responses. It makes me feel like you are just dismissing my > review comments (I'm not assuming that was your intention). Currently we only support inline expansion of operations for which auto-vectorization support is in place, for other expanders is_unsupported_lane_type rejects intrinsification, plan is to lift these check one by one after through validation of expanders for Float16 type in subsequent patches. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28002#discussion_r3363081079
