core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8386957: C2 VectorAPI: Predicated operation support for intrinsified Float16Vector unary/binary/ternary operations on AVX512-FP16 targets [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386957: C2 VectorAPI: Predicated operation support for intrinsified Float16Vector unary/binary/ternary operations on AVX512-FP16 targets [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386957: C2 VectorAPI: Predicated operation support for intrinsified Float16Vector unary/binary/ternary operations on AVX512-FP16 targets [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386957: C2 VectorAPI: Predicated operation support for intrinsified Float16Vector unary/binary/ternary operations on AVX512-FP16 targets [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386957: C2 VectorAPI: Predicated operation support for intrinsified Float16Vector unary/binary/ternary operations on AVX512-FP16 targets [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386957: C2 VectorAPI: Predicated operation support for intrinsified Float16Vector unary/binary/ternary operations on AVX512-FP16 targets [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386957: C2 VectorAPI: Predicated operation support for intrinsified Float16Vector unary/binary/ternary operations on AVX512-FP16 targets [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386957: C2 VectorAPI: Predicated operation support for intrinsified Float16Vector unary/binary/ternary operations on AVX512-FP16 targets [v2] Sandhya Viswanathan
• RFR: 8388343: Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388343: Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388343: Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8388343: Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8388343: Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388343: Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Coleen Phillimore
• Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v8] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v8] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v8] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v8] duke
• Re: RFR: 8380847: Versioned class loaded from multi-release jar file is not cached [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
• Re: RFR: 8389187: -XX:+VerifyContinuations triggers assert(max_thawing_size() == calculated_max_size) Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8389187: -XX:+VerifyContinuations triggers assert(max_thawing_size() == calculated_max_size) Patricio Chilano Mateo
• Re: RFR: 8389187: -XX:+VerifyContinuations triggers assert(max_thawing_size() == calculated_max_size) [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8389187: -XX:+VerifyContinuations triggers assert(max_thawing_size() == calculated_max_size) [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8389187: -XX:+VerifyContinuations triggers assert(max_thawing_size() == calculated_max_size) [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8389187: -XX:+VerifyContinuations triggers assert(max_thawing_size() == calculated_max_size) [v2] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8389187: -XX:+VerifyContinuations triggers assert(max_thawing_size() == calculated_max_size) [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
• RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v2] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v2] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v2] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v3] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v3] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v4] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v4] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v4] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v5] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v6] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v6] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet [v6] Bill Huang
  • Withdrawn: 8384611: Add value class test coverage to java.util HashMap and HashSet Bill Huang
• RFR: 8389705: RawBytecodeHelper doesn't check bounds passed to unsafe code Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389705: RawBytecodeHelper doesn't check bounds passed to unsafe code Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8389705: RawBytecodeHelper doesn't check bounds passed to unsafe code [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389705: RawBytecodeHelper doesn't check bounds passed to unsafe code [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8389705: RawBytecodeHelper doesn't check bounds passed to unsafe code [v2] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8389705: RawBytecodeHelper doesn't check bounds passed to unsafe code Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v7] Kuai Wei
• Re: RFR: 8282365: Consolidate and improve division by constant idealizations [v5] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8282365: Consolidate and improve division by constant idealizations [v5] Quan Anh Mai
• Re: RFR: 8282365: Consolidate and improve division by constant idealizations [v4] Quan Anh Mai
• Re: RFR: 8383724: C2: Implement AddI128T and SubI128T [v2] Quan Anh Mai
• Re: RFR: 8383724: C2: Implement AddI128T and SubI128T [v3] Quan Anh Mai
• RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v2] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v3] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v4] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v5] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v6] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v6] Jorn Vernee
  • Integrated: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8384062: Add a new method List::removeAt to avoid overload confusion [v6] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8384062: Add a new method List::removeAt to avoid overload confusion [v5] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v2] Eric Fang
• Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v3] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v3] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v3] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v3] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v3] Eric Fang
• Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
• RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Roland Westrelin
  • Re: RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Mohamed Issa
  • Integrated: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Galder Zamarreño
• RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Alex Buckley
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: BaseFileManager --preview-mode handling need to be more robust [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: BaseFileManager --preview-mode handling need to be more robust [v2] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: BaseFileManager --preview-mode handling need to be more robust [v2] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8389654: BaseFileManager --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Chen Liang
• Integrated: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner Brent Christian
• Re: RFR: 8371795: Improve documentation of Class.isInstance [v8] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8371795: Improve documentation of Class.isInstance [v7] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8371795: Improve documentation of Class.isInstance [v6] Chen Liang
• Withdrawn: 8386113: Link BigDecimal.toPlainString to Algorithmic Complexity section duke
• [jdk27] RFR: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Christoph Langer
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Christoph Langer
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Matthias Baesken
  • [jdk27] Withdrawn: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Christoph Langer
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Christoph Langer
• RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well Shiv Shah
• Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v7] Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v7] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v7] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
• RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v3] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v4] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] duke
  • Integrated: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale by1361092
• Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v16] Archie Cobbs
• Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} [v2] duke
• Re: RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data [v2] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v3] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v3] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v6] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v7] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v8] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v9] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v9] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v9] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v10] Marc Chevalier

• Earlier messages
• Later messages