On Feb 1, 2017, at 14:14, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 at 11:02 Ned Deily <n...@python.org> wrote: >> On Feb 1, 2017, at 12:43, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: >> > Historically commit messages for CPython have had the form of "Issue >> > #NNNN: did something". The problem is that Github automatically links >> > "#NNNN" to GitHub issues (which includes pull requests). To prevent >> > incorrect linking we need to change how we reference issue numbers. >> > >> > The current candidates are: >> > >> > issue NNNN (notice the lack of #) >> >> +1 >> >> That form, as well as issueNNNN (no space), is already recognized in >> comments on bugs.python.org and autogenerates a link to the bug. >> >> https://docs.python.org/devguide/triaging.html#generating-special-links-in-a-comment > We can change it to do whatever we want since we control bpo, so it can be > updated to automatically link bpoNNNN or "bpo NNNN" as well.
Sure. My point was that IssueNNNN is a form that is already in common use: I, for one, use it all the time. Why invent another one? -- Ned Deily n...@python.org -- [] _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
