On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 at 17:32 Senthil Kumaran <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Brett Cannon <[email protected]> wrote: > > And since we will be creating a new project there will be no pre-existing > > issues to accidentally link to when we push the converted repo. > > That's a good news.. Thanks for testing this, Brett. This seems to > apply to both issues and pull requests > > I was not worried about issues, since we would be using b.p.o. I was > thinking pull-requests could cause problems, if there was any auto > hyperlink happening. > > The choice is still with us. We can rewrite #NNNN to "bpo NNNN" if we want. > > +ve: It seems future proof to me. > -ve: Looks a bit ugly when compared to #NNNN > I say try rewriting s/#(\d+)/bpo-\1/ and let's see how it turns out if you're up for it, Senthil (notice I went with the hyphen approach for "bpo-").
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
