On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 at 02:32 Maciej Szulik <solt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:19 AM, Senthil Kumaran <sent...@uthcode.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Ned Deily <n...@python.org> wrote: > > It would be great if you could try something, Senthil. > > I did a sample migration of the repo with the change we discussed for > rewrite #NNNN to bpo-NNNN > > The migrated test-repo is here: > https://github.com/orsenthil/cpython-migration-test > > An example of commit message re-write from #NNNN to bpo-NNNN is here: > > https://github.com/orsenthil/cpython-migration-test/commit/c64d263ec003f09fe4ebc50912fbe28de96fb2d3 > > Please review the repo and see if it has everything that we will need > after migration > > > Looks fine for me, thanks! >
Just to remind people, the migration is happening Friday, so we need to make a yay/nay on whether we are going to tweak the history as Senthil has tested very soon. So I'm putting a deadline of Wednesday night to vote on whether we should tweak the history as proposed. I'll look at the results and will make a final decision Thursday as to whether we will tweak the history or leave it as-is. So far Maciej is +1 on the change, which puts the change in the lead. :)
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
