On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Zachary Ware
<zachary.ware+py...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9 February 2017 at 18:42, Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+py...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote:
>>>> +1: Nick, Senthil, Chris
>>>> +0: ...
>>>> -0: Martin, Brett
>>>> -1: Naoki, Berker
>>>

...

> An option that I would be less against would be to, instead of
> rewriting the actual message, tack '\n\n[bpo-12345]' onto the end of
> the message. At least that way any misfires would be non-destructive.
>

While I was -1 on rewriting, -0 for this approach.
_______________________________________________
core-workflow mailing list
core-workflow@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: 
https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct

Reply via email to