On Feb 11, 2008 4:00 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the new structure, but there is one thing that irritates me to no
> end: "@"
> When I first read the dts without the accompanying discussion, I
> completely misunderstood the structure because of the "@". I thought the
> "@" really meant "at" in the sense that it refers to the address of the
> parent entity, e.g "[EMAIL PROTECTED],0" means "the pci device at bus 0,0".
> However,
> the true meaning/translation of "@" seems to be "device with
> address/number", e.g. "[EMAIL PROTECTED],0" means "pci device with address
> 0,0".
> Can we please have another separator like "-" or ":" or "_"? All of
> those alternative separators convey the meaning better.
>
I actually like @. It's part of the standard. Anyone else care to comment here?
Here is the latest: enabled is assumed, and 'disabled' will disable it.
ron
/{
mainboard-vendor = "Emulation";
mainboard-name = "QEMU x86";
enabled;
constructor = "qemuvga_constructors";
cpus {};
[EMAIL PROTECTED] {
/config/("northbridge/intel/i440bxemulation/dts");
[EMAIL PROTECTED] {
[EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
};
[EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
/config/("southbridge/intel/i82371eb/dts");
};
};
};
};
--
coreboot mailing list
coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
