On Feb 12, 2008 3:15 PM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 11:13 AM, Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > mainboard-vendor = "Emulation";
> > > mainboard-name = "QEMU x86";
>
Can we possibly pull this info (or defaults for this info) from Kconfig?
>
> > > enabled;
> >
> > Again, is this enabled still needed?
>
> no, it is the default, I keep forgetting to yank it. Fixed.
>
>
> >
> >
> > > constructor = "qemuvga_constructors";
> > > cpus {};
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] --> domain 0
> > > /config/("northbridge/intel/i440bxemulation/dts");
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] --> bus 0
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 --> dev 0 function 1
> > > };
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
> [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 --> dev 1 function 0
why shorten device to dev and not fuction to func? is it possible to set it
up so people/developers can use either dev or device?
> I'm very happy with the above except for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] syntax.
>
> I'm happy to see an alternate, although I don't have a problem with
> the @ myself. I'm used to it from Suns. But propose something
> reasonable that won't break the parser and we can try it.
I don't see the problem either, except that it looks ugly (IMO). I'm fine
with it either way.
> > I don't even understand all the path types. What are they for the
> > different node types?
>
> see comments above, do they make sense?
>
> ron
>
-Corey
--
coreboot mailing list
coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
