On 13.02.2008 04:58, ron minnich wrote: > On Feb 12, 2008 3:02 PM, Corey Osgood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Feb 12, 2008 3:15 PM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> On Feb 12, 2008 11:13 AM, Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>>> mainboard-vendor = "Emulation"; >>>>> mainboard-name = "QEMU x86"; >>>>> >> Can we possibly pull this info (or defaults for this info) from Kconfig? > > Sure, I am fine with that. Comments? >
Why not? But let's do that step in another patch. > Here is the dts again. > > /{ > mainboard-vendor = "Emulation"; > mainboard-name = "QEMU x86"; > constructor = "qemuvga_constructors"; > cpus {}; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] { > /config/("northbridge/intel/i440bxemulation/dts"); > [EMAIL PROTECTED] { > [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 { > }; > [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 { > /config/("southbridge/intel/i82371eb/dts"); > }; > }; > }; > }; > > > That's the whole file. > > Let's try to bring this to closure. The score so far. > > Stepan: is ok with '@' syntax (as are segher etc. ) > Ron: is not that concerned either way as long as an alternative > carl-daniel, peter, corey: do not like @ syntax but need to propose a > reasonable alternative (they have tried but not totally there yet) > which does not make the parser hard to modify. > Alternatives are "-" (used by memreserve and inside names) or ":" (used by memreg) or "_" (used inside names). I hope at least one of them is considered as reasonable alternative. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot