On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I doubt we want condifional compilation at all. coreboot is firmware, >> not an OS, and we don't want lots of variant versions. I lean toward >> yanking this type of conditional compilation. > > I think the reason this was originally done was for size. There might be > some people who are unhappy with HT, PCIe, and PCIx support compiled in for > their embedded box.
Isn't all that kind of things doable via function pointers and link-time dead code elimination ? That would achieve the no ifdeffery goal, and may be cleaner code... Am I on crack ? -- Vincent Legoll -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
