On 02/03/2011 10:17 AM, Josef Kellermann wrote: >> e are at it. I'm attaching some very old patch (r2978 ;) >> which contains some errata fixes too, if you have some spare time >> please try to check if it is correct. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rudolf Marek <r.ma...@assembler.cz> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Rudolf >> > Hi, > are you sure ?
You're right: AMD Publication #33610, page34 "[Regarding erratum #131] Systems implementing the workaround for erratum #169 should not apply this workaround." So it seems AMD recommends either or, but not both. Page 59: "[Regarding erratum #169] The workaround for this erratum supersedes the workaround for erratum #131. When implementing this workaround, the workaround for erratum #131 should not be applied." So we better implement only 169, and explain in the comments why 131 is left out. Alex -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
