On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:00 PM Timothy Pearson < [email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/09/2017 04:55 PM, ron minnich wrote: > > yes I do. I'm working from ToT. Bisecting now > > This brings up an interesting question. How should we be testing for > payload-dependent failures on systems like the REACTS? The possibility > of the payload causing breakage within coreboot itself was not even > considered before now. > > I think what we need is a good regression test payload kernel. This is what I"ve done on ports to powerpc and riscv. You have a simple priveleged mode bundle of code that exercises known failure cases. I've found plan 9 (now harvey) to be an easy code base for this, but a smaller, lighter kernel would probably be even better.
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
