-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/09/2017 05:12 PM, ron minnich wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:00 PM Timothy Pearson > <tpear...@raptorengineering.com <mailto:tpear...@raptorengineering.com>> > wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/09/2017 04:55 PM, ron minnich wrote: > > yes I do. I'm working from ToT. Bisecting now > > This brings up an interesting question. How should we be testing for > payload-dependent failures on systems like the REACTS? The possibility > of the payload causing breakage within coreboot itself was not even > considered before now. > > > I think what we need is a good regression test payload kernel. This is > what I"ve done on ports to powerpc and riscv. You have a simple > priveleged mode bundle of code that exercises known failure cases. > > I've found plan 9 (now harvey) to be an easy code base for this, but a > smaller, lighter kernel would probably be even better.
Agreed. I'll add this to our master list of desired features in REACTS. - -- Timothy Pearson Raptor Engineering +1 (415) 727-8645 (direct line) +1 (512) 690-0200 (switchboard) https://www.raptorengineering.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYdBkiAAoJEK+E3vEXDOFbtYYH/RXbDOTf5Z8QG+QM/hvuInXt dgoQ766jXr12b7qbNb/Do+oj6NHKxjiDfAWMbrPUKYTNCaxP22JDF3qhohQQGs8c 3YCJ8rYGM9G0JGPPoY8mgIfY5UjnEDC5sQdJewLD9nw1VsxPAC+IVVY62wPSacKV zdoDxF3lKLjqbQAqDmJEpAJSTmULZqhRsWKNvffiITQvcD2hIwuWNpGW5oibCHtD 27kFvy6vn32hQRBa0b97daq2VN3Kguwk+fNiGo+rVQd/jPveljq6PA0GWA9IlU5R 5s/6vVapgglwhycQZS/GcYrluPKA8lA9FIJjX5GkXQwKHRLpeu3N9jnjxfg6+4M= =zHWt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot