Hi Nate, Thanks a lot for listening to our request and taking care of this! I'm happy to see the binaries finally updated and the FSP headers in coreboot having a matching publicly available binary to use. You've only mentioned Kabylake in your email, is it safe to assume that you'll use these same practices for future platforms as well ?
Thanks, Youness. On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:04 PM Desimone, Nathaniel L <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am a UEFI firmware architect working for Intel Corp. One of my focus areas > is FSP. There was some prior discussion here regarding the lack of public > updates for Kaby Lake FSP binaries and headers and questions regarding > specialized FSP binaries being built for specific boards. I would like to > clear up some of these questions and concerns. We just pushed all of the > recently released versions of Kaby Lake FSP (3.1.0 through 3.6.0) to > https://github.com/IntelFsp/FSP/tree/Kabylake. While there might appear to be > forks of Kaby Lake FSP, they are actually just snapshots at different points > in time. For example, there is one commit labelled as "Gold release for Kaby > Lake FSP" that appears to be special fork for IoT devices... this commit is > actually just Kaby Lake FSP Release 2.6.0 without any IoT specific > modifications. Apologies for the confusing commit messages and for the > temporary lapse in updates. > > With Best Regards, > > Nate > > -- > coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
