Pádraig Brady <[email protected]> writes: > On 20/09/2025 22:32, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> On 20/09/2025 22:18, Collin Funk wrote: >>> Without the cfarm210 section you get an error like this: >>> >>> $ ssh cfarm210.cfarm.net >>> Unable to negotiate with 213.178.77.185 port 22: no matching host key >>> type found. Their offer: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss >>> >>> Is that what you see? >> I had a more commplex evolved "Host cfarm210.cfarm.net" section, >> which had inadvertently specified the wrong User. Blush. >> I've access now, and I'll do some testing soon. > > Well on cfarm210 that specific error doesn't seem to be an issue. > > $ export LC_ALL=fr_FR.UTF-8 > > $ src/printf '\uB250\uB250\uB250\n' | src/fold -w5 > 뉐뉐 > 뉐 > > $ src/printf '\uB250\uB250\uB250\n' | src/wc -L > 6 > > Now there are all sorts of other failures due > the following happening at a low level for most commands: > open64(".", 04000404200) Err#22 EINVAL > > Note this system is: > SunOS gcc-solaris10 5.10 Generic_Virtual sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise > while Bruno's was: > SunOS 5.10 Generic_147441-19 i86pc i386 > > So I'm not getting any farther really on cfarm210
I think I remember Paul saying that UCLA still has old Solaris machines. Maybe he can help out, but I do not blame him if he cannot use them, or wants to avoid touching Solaris 10 at all costs. :) Collin
