On 20/09/2025 23:25, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 20/09/2025 22:32, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 20/09/2025 22:18, Collin Funk wrote:
Without the cfarm210 section you get an error like this:
$ ssh cfarm210.cfarm.net
Unable to negotiate with 213.178.77.185 port 22: no matching host key
type found. Their offer: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
Is that what you see?
I had a more commplex evolved "Host cfarm210.cfarm.net" section,
which had inadvertently specified the wrong User. Blush.
I've access now, and I'll do some testing soon.
Well on cfarm210 that specific error doesn't seem to be an issue.
$ export LC_ALL=fr_FR.UTF-8
$ src/printf '\uB250\uB250\uB250\n' | src/fold -w5
뉐뉐
뉐
$ src/printf '\uB250\uB250\uB250\n' | src/wc -L
6
Now there are all sorts of other failures due
the following happening at a low level for most commands:
open64(".", 04000404200) Err#22 EINVAL
Note this system is:
SunOS gcc-solaris10 5.10 Generic_Virtual sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise
while Bruno's was:
SunOS 5.10 Generic_147441-19 i86pc i386
So I'm not getting any farther really on cfarm210
I got access to another Solaris 10 machine:
SunOS login 5.10 Generic_150400-17 sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220
The test was skipped do to no fr_FR.UTF-8 locale,
but there was an en_US.UTF-8 locale available,
and modifying the test to use that, resulted in a PASS.
So again I'm unable to reproduce this failure.
So as far as I can see, properly configured Solaris 10 is OK.
Given it's EOL soon anyway I'm just going to apply the previous
patch to make the tests more defensive.
cheers,
Padraig
