This thread wandered into the weeds a while ago. It's now closed. On Mar 6, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Trek Glowacki wrote:
> > On Mar 4, 2009, at 6:08 AM, Peter Schober wrote: > >> * Trek Glowacki <pietr...@umich.edu> [2009-03-03 21:24]: >>> So, to a third party observer both versions of the Cosign Equation >>> evaluate to "no value". Not knowing the exact parameters of the >>> Equation he can only assume one of the two: >>> >>> Nothing, Nowhere ("cosign technical expertise is in fact a myth. >>> The >>> project is a clever hoax") >>> Something, Nowhere ("cosign technical expertise exists it will not >>> be >>> made generally available") >>> >>> ~ OR ~ >>> >>> One could say it's the "clever trickster or selfish prick" dilemma. > > Ah, science! No sooner do you arrive at hypothesis than contrary > evidence appears. > >> Oh please. Technical people tasked with installing security >> infrastructure software (which this is) should certainly be able to >> deal with the existing information (README and wiki). Or ask the >> mailing list. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Cosign-discuss mailing list Cosign-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cosign-discuss