This thread wandered into the weeds a while ago. It's now closed.
On Mar 6, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Trek Glowacki wrote:
>
> On Mar 4, 2009, at 6:08 AM, Peter Schober wrote:
>
>> * Trek Glowacki <pietr...@umich.edu> [2009-03-03 21:24]:
>>> So, to a third party observer both versions of the Cosign Equation
>>> evaluate to "no value". Not knowing the exact parameters of the
>>> Equation he can only assume one of the two:
>>>
>>> Nothing, Nowhere ("cosign technical expertise is in fact a myth.
>>> The
>>> project is a clever hoax")
>>> Something, Nowhere ("cosign technical expertise exists it will not
>>> be
>>> made generally available")
>>>
>>> ~ OR ~
>>>
>>> One could say it's the "clever trickster or selfish prick" dilemma.
>
> Ah, science! No sooner do you arrive at hypothesis than contrary
> evidence appears.
>
>> Oh please. Technical people tasked with installing security
>> infrastructure software (which this is) should certainly be able to
>> deal with the existing information (README and wiki). Or ask the
>> mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Cosign-discuss mailing list
Cosign-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cosign-discuss
