----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
Hi:: Its Me, Greg I am not through with the field approval as yet even though I had a 337 from a Mooney M-10 to use as ammo. I did not invest in the JPI as they were extremely difficult to get any type of engineering answers out of. I purchased the Electronic Industries model with the 90 gph transducer which is the recommended unit for the Ercoupe/Aircoupe gravity feed. I have yet to get the airplane back together to calibrate it and try it. possibly tomorrow. D. Wayne Woollard Greg Bullough wrote: > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > At 10:23 AM 9/10/01 -0700, Paul Anton wrote: > >I am considering installing a JPI Fuel Scan 450 in my > >0-200 equipped Coupe. > > I seem to recall that one has to be a bit careful with planes > that are gravity-fed from a fuselage tank. I read same in > some catalog entry for (I think) the Shadin product. In > the case of a 172, you have enough 'head' that the > sensing unit both has enough pressure to work properly > AND doesn't impede the flow. But in cases where the > fuel flows only a foot or so downhill, things may go > awry. > > I also recall that someone on the list has a fuel > computer in their plane, but don't recall who. > > Greg > -- Mr. D. Wayne Woollard, CPBE AIM: DWWoollard ICQ: 124132836 "Why fly a Spam can when you can have fun and fly an Ercoupe?" ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aVxiLm.aVzvvT Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
