----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----
In a message dated 9/17/01 11:01:29 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 




I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back to the 
Stone Age." Ron Owens, on KGO Talk Radio today, allowed that this would 
mean killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do with this 
atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral damage. What 
else can we do?" Minutes later I heard some TV pundit discussing whether 
we "have the belly to do what must be done." And I thought about the 
issues being raised especially hard because I am from Afghanistan, and 
even though I've lived here for 35 years I've never lost track of what's 
going on there. So I want to tell anyone who will listen how it all looks 
from where I'm standing. 

I speak as one who deeply hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. My hatred

comes from first hand experience. There is no doubt in my mind that these 
people were responsible for the atrocity in New York. I agree that 
something must be done about those monsters.  But the Taliban and Bin 
Laden are not Afghanistan.  They're not even the government of 
Afghanistan. The Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics who took over 
Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political criminal with a plan. When 
you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think Bin Laden, think Hitler. 
And when you think "the people of Afghanistan" think "the Jews in the 
concentration camps." It's not only that the Afghan people had nothing to 
do with this atrocity. They were the first victims of the perpetrators. 
They would exult if someone would come in there, take out the Taliban and 
clear out the rats nest of international thugs holed up in their country. 

Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the Taliban? The 
answer is, they're starved, exhausted, hurt, incapacitated, suffering.  A 
few years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are 500,000 
disabled orphans in Afghanistan--a country with no economy, no food. 
There are millions of widows. And the Taliban has been burying these 
widows alive in mass graves. The soil is littered with land mines, the 
farms were all destroyed by the Soviets. These are a few of the reasons 
why the Afghan people have not overthrown the Taliban. 

We come now to the question of "bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone 
Age". Trouble is, that's been done. The Soviets took care of it already. 
Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering. Level their houses? 
Done.  Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done.  Eradicate their 
hospitals?  Done. Destroy their infrastructure? Cut them off from medicine

and health care? Too late. Someone already did all that.  New bombs would 
only stir the rubble of earlier bombs. 

Would they at least get the Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan, 
only the Taliban eat, only they have the means to move around.  They'd 
slip away and hide.  Maybe the bombs would get some of those disabled 
orphans, they don't move too fast, they don't even have wheelchairs. But 
flying over Kabul and dropping bombs would not really be a strike against 
the criminals who did this horrific thing. Actually it would only be 
making common cause with the Taliban--by raping once again the people 
they've been raping all this time. 

So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me now speak with true 
fear and trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden is to go in there with 
ground troops. When people speak of "having the belly to do what needs to 
be done" they're thinking in terms of having the belly to kill as many as 
needed. Having the belly to overcome any moral qualms about killing 
innocent people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand. What's actually on 
the table is Americans dying. And not just because some Americans would 
die fighting their way through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout. It's 
much bigger than that folks. 

Because to get any troops to Afghanistan, we'd have to go through 
Pakistan. Would they let us? Not likely. The conquest of Pakistan would 
have to be first. Will other Muslim nations just stand by? You see where 
I'm going. We're flirting with a world war between Islam and the West. 
And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he wants. 
That's why he did this. Read his speeches and statements. It's all right 
there. He really believes Islam would beat the west. It might seem 
ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world into Islam and the

West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the west wreaks a holocaust in those

lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to lose, that's even 
better from Bin Laden's point of view.  He's probably wrong, in the end 
the West would win, whatever that would mean, but the war would last for 
years and millions would die, not just theirs but ours. 

Who has the belly for that?  Unfortunately, Bin Laden does. Anyone else? 

In Peace, 
Tamim Ansary 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 





==^================================================================

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aVxiLm.aVzvvT

Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register

==^================================================================

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to